(A) PARAMETRIC FUNCTONS
Sometimes, when expressing
as a function of
, one might not use a direction relation between
and
; instead, one might express both
and
as functions of a third variable, say
:
In that case, how would
be evaluated?
One option is to eliminate the parameter
and obtain a relation involving only
and
, from which
may be obtained; however, this could lead to cumbersome expressions.
Another alternative can be taken as follows; we rearrange
to involve
also:
This relation says that for evaluating the derivative of
w.r.t
, we evaluate the derivative of
and
w.r.t the parameter
, and then take their ratio.
Let us try this on some examples:
(i) |
This parametric relation represents a circle of radius
. We will follow both the approaches to determine
:
Square and add the two relations for
| |
(ii) |
This parametric relation represents an ellipse with major and minor axis
and
respectively.
In later examples, we will observe that in many cases, parametric differentiation turns out to be much more convenient than differentiation after elimination.
(B) IMPLICIT FUNCTIONS
Sometimes, the relation between the variables
and
is specified in the form
that is,
is not explicitly specified in terms of
, since this explicit expression is either not possible or not convenient.
In such a case,
is said to be an implicit function of
.
How do we find
in such a case?
We simply differentiate the relation
with respect to
, using
for the derivative of the variable
. Then we solve for
.
This will become clear from some examples:
Differentiating both sides w.r.t
| |
Differentiating both sides w.r.t
| |
Differentiating both sides w.r.t
| |
Observe that in case of differentiation of implicit functions, the expression for the derivative
will generally not be independent of
.
No comments:
Post a Comment